Saturday, 26 October 2019

Digging up Franco in the Economist


The Economist is to be congratulated again on its balanced coverage of Spain. Its article on the exhumation of Franco concludes thus:
The Socialists want to turn the Valley into “a museum of memory”. There is a risk in that of history once again being written by one side. Perhaps the best thing would be to deconsecrate the site and create a museum that explains what happened at the Valley itself. … Modern Spain is not in thrall to Franco’s ghost. Most Spaniards have no memory of the dictator. Only an ageing minority still regularly attend mass. But the lack of unanimity over the exhumation shows that the country has yet to agree on the past. Perhaps it never will.
The crucial, and most unusual, point that is made here is the clear recognition that Spain is still far from achieving closure and a simple view of the events of the 1930s, from the creation of the Second Republic in 1931 to Franco’s victory in 1939. The Left often gives the impression that it seeks revenge, that it wants to refight the war and win it this time, rather than desiring unity. It will indeed take time to agree on the past, much more than is pretended by those who seek an immediate rewriting of the “historical memory”. The start of a search for consensus and common agreement would be welcome.

Thursday, 24 October 2019

The GuETArdian and terrorism

Arnaldo Otegui is an ETA terrorist who has eaten the King of Spain’s porridge and is barred from holding elected office until February 2021. But according to the GuETArdian its correspondent is a happy chappie with a winning smile who runs a progressive political party.


Otegui was released from prison in March 2016 after serving part of a 10-year sentence for membership of ETA that was handed down in 2011. His sentence included the 10-year election ban. He was convicted of membership of ETA and acting illegally at its orders. A conviction of being a leader of ETA was quashed on appeal and the prison sentence was reduced to 6½ years, although the 10-year disbarment still stands. We have full respect for that decision and are happy to say explicitly that Arnaldo Otegui was not a leader of ETA. In exactly the same way that Gerry Adams was never a leader of the IRA.

In 1979 he was convicted of kidnapping a businessman and sentenced to six years, which he served from 1979 – 1983

In 2006 he got 15 months for glorification of terrorism.

The GuETArdian knows all this because it has Stephen Burgen and Sam Jones in Spain and they tell GuETArdian Central what is going on here. It’s what they’re paid for. But the editor Katharine Viner ignores them. Why? Because she is dazzled by the word “progressive” perhaps. Or is she following the ancient British policy of strictly observing the law at home while fostering mayhem abroad? With Brexit approaching, Gibraltar could get a bit tricky, and the GuETArdian may have decided that a touch of anti-Spanish feeling never goes amiss.



After all (as we reported here), on 14 October the GuETArdian gave a platform to Carles Puigdemont, a man on the run from extremely serious criminal charges in Spain, charges for which his comrades have received 11½ years. It is well known that his lawyer Gonzalo Boye once got 14 years for taking part in an ETA kidnapping. The other day the Spanish Policía Nacional raided Boye's home searching for evidence of laundering drug money.

They say that you can judge a person by the company that they keep.






GuETArdian editor Katharine Viner with her new best friends.



Sources
(Spanish)
ABC
(What offences has Otegui been found guilty of?)

Wikipedia

vozpópuli
(Gonzalo Boye: Puigdemont’s lawyer convicted of collaborating with ETA)


Tuesday, 22 October 2019

Catalonia Today: sabotage and aggression

After the violent occupation of Barcelona airport and the blockading of main roads, a train hit a tree that had been felled and placed deliberately on a railway line.

 * * * * *
A motorcyclist tried to run a road block set up by the “brownshirts” of the CDR (Committees for the Defence of the Republic) who were following the exhortation of Catalan premier Quim Torra to “Press hard” (his family are all CDR members). The rider was insulted forcefully and the keys of his motorbike were taken from him. The only response from the Mossos (Catalan police) was to take his details. There is no evidence that they acted in any way against the aggressors.
45-second video of the incident.

 Sources
(Spanish)
La Vanguardia
(A local train hits a deliberately felled tree on the tracks)
  
El Catalán.es
(A motorcyclist is attacked (as the Mossos watch) after his keys are stolen for not stopping at a roadblock in Barcelona’s Gran Vía)
  
El Periódico
(Torra to the Committees for the Defence of the Republic: “Press hard, and you’re right to press hard”)

El Muindo
(Quim Torra’s link with the CDR: the family “signed up” to the radical group)

Will the SNP's next leader be a seditionist?


Joanna Cherry is a Scottish lawyer. She is a member of the élite of her profession that are known as Queen’s Counsel. As such she is allowed to put the letters QC after her name, charge higher fees, and wear a silk gown in court.
Joanna Cherry QC is a member of the British Parliament, the member for Edinburgh South West. As such she puts the letters MP after her name. She sits for the Scottish National Party and is its parliamentary spokesperson on Justice and Home Affairs. She is positioning herself as a potential future leader of the party.
Joanna Cherry QC MP is an important person who holds two public posts of great responsibility.
Joanna Cherry QC MP supports sedition in Spain and makes no secret of the fact.
We have met Joanna Cherry QC MP before; she had a walk-on part in this post as one of the people who accepted a freebie from the Catalan government to act as “observers” at the referendum on 1 October 2017. Why a British lawyer, especially one who is allowed to wear a silk gown, chose to lend her prestige to an act that was illegal at the time and has since been judged seditious is a matter on which some may wish to speculate.
On 13 December 2018 Joanna Cherry QC MP issued this tweet. 

Carme Forcadell was once a rabble-rousing populist.
Catalonia – Europe’s next state
However, in the autumn of 2017 she was the speaker of the Catalan parliament when, in the words of the Economist:
… the separatists used their narrow majority in the Catalan parliament to ram through laws tearing up the constitution and the region’s statute of home rule. They deployed the resources of the Generalitat [Catalan government] to organise their “binding referendum” on independence, which they then used to declare an independent republic. They did all this despite repeated warnings of the illegality of their actions.
This is the extremely serious criminal action for which Forcadell was charged and held on remand, and for which she has now been given 11½ years for sedition, as have her fellow prisoners. One might suppose that Joanna Cherry QC MP, lawyer and parliamentarian, would stand on the side of the rule of law and constitutional government. But she doesn’t.
Instead, Joanna Cherry QC MP chooses to propagate the lie that Spain has political prisoners. Personal opinions may differ, but a British lawyer and parliamentarian should be guided initially by the good reputation enjoyed by Spain a member of the EU, NATO and the Council of Europe, and by the fact that neither Amnesty International nor Human Rights Watch mentions political prisoners in the country (“prisoners of conscience” in Amnesty’s usual terminology). She knows this of course. Lawyers, especially the posh ones who wear silk gowns, and MPs, especially those who join specialist All Party Parliamentary groups, do their homework before they make public statements. Nevertheless, she chooses to pose with this lying placard.
It goes without saying that Joanna Cherry QC MP, silk-gowned lawyer and SNP parliamentary spokesperson for Justice, knows perfectly well what she is doing. She has Spanish and Catalan at a good level and follows the local traditional and social media easily. This must, at least be a very reasonable assumption. She is, after all, a member of the UK All-Party Parliamentary Group on Catalonia and was an observer at the illegal referendum. How could she possibly perform these duties conscientiously without having first-hand knowledge of all the local circumstances? 

The British House of Commons met on Saturday 19 October 2019 to debate Brexit. Joanna Cherry QC MP was there, wearing the Yellow Ribbon of Sedition as her Westminster Leader Ian Blackford had done a few days earlier. The SNP has so far run its campaign for Scottish separation legally. One must wonder, however, what will happen if it runs into serious difficulty. Might the party’s taste for sedition abroad spread nearer to home? At present they seem content with the traditional British policy of legality at home and mayhem abroad. But who can tell?
Joanna Cherry QC MP, silk-gowned lawyer and parliamentary spokesperson on Justice, aspires to lead her party and perhaps even to be the Scottish First Minister who negotiates the entry of an independent Scotland into the EU. In doing so, she will meet David Sassoli, the President of the European Parliament. He has expressed his unambiguous respect for the rule of law in Spain and for this judgment in particular. His immediate predecessor Antonio Tajani is also clear: “Under Italian law the independence leaders would be in prison for the rest of their lives.” Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker has said “Nationalisms are a poison that prevent Europe from working together.”
The simple truth is that the EU leaders prize the rule of law and European unity highly, and hate nationalism and separatism wholeheartedly. How will Joanna Cherry QC MP and seditionist react when confronted with real European democratic politics in a real, democratic political institution, one that is a world away from the posturing, dilettante play-acting of the Scottish National Party?

Sources
(English)
The Scotsman

YouTube

The Economist

Human Rights Watch

Amnesty International

euobserver

(Spanish)
Europapress
(The President of the European Parliament respects the ruling of the Spanish Supreme Court and calls for a reduction of tension in Catalonia)

El Español
Antonio Tajani: “Under Italian law the independence leaders would be in prison for the rest of their lives.”









Friday, 18 October 2019

The Economist gets Spain right and the Guardian fights the class war


This blog has in the past been critical of the Economist’s coverage of Spain. It is thus only fair that we mention an article in this week’s edition that is most unusual in the British media. It actually is an accurate description of what is happening in this country in the affair of the famous trial of the Catalan politicians. The headline is a good start:
Catalan nationalists protest as their leaders are jailed for sedition
Here is a recognition, perhaps unprecedented in the usually lazy, toadying media, that the protests are from "nationalists", not by any means from all of “the Catalans”.
Then there is the hellish photo of a main road closed by fire rather than cheerful, colourful images of separatist symbols.
And the article itself has a splendid statement of what has actually happened in Catalonia:
Spanish officials stress that the defendants were on trial for their actions, not their ideas. The cause of independence has never enjoyed clear majority support in Catalonia. Josep Borrell, the foreign minister, who is Catalan, accused Mr Torra of a “totalitarian attitude” in denying the Catalan-ness of those who disagree with independence. “The root of the problem is that Catalan society is divided in two and one of those parts excludes the other,” said Mr Borrell, who is about to become the EU’s new foreign-policy chief.
In 2017 the separatists used their narrow majority in the Catalan parliament to ram through laws tearing up the constitution and the region’s statute of home rule. They deployed the resources of the Generalitat to organise their “binding referendum” on independence, which they then used to declare an independent republic. They did all this despite repeated warnings of the illegality of their actions.
It is particularly instructive to compare this from the Economist:
The sentence triggered days of protests in which masked demonstrators first blockaded Barcelona airport and then set dozens of fires and barricades in the centre of the city. Among more than 150 people injured were 72 police, most of them from the Catalan force. Contradictorily, [Catalan premier Quim] Torra at first encouraged the protests while the Generalitat’s [Catalan] police was repressing them. The protests mark both a radicalisation and fragmentation of the independence movement. Pere Aragonès, Mr Torra’s deputy, warned against violence.
with the Guardian’s mendacious pretence that the matter can be reduced to the Orwellian simplicity of “Left wing good. Right wing bad”. As we showed the other day, the Guardian’s beloved “pro-independence supporters” have clear links with the European far right (our emphasis).
Barcelona suffered its fourth and worst night of violence on Thursday as pro-independence supporters clashed with police and right-wing groups in running battles well into the small hours of Friday morning.
One pro-independence protester was badly beaten by a group of right-wing supporters while once again the streets were acrid with the smell of bonfires of burning rubbish. Numerous injuries were reported.
This Guardian report is from 00.39 BST on Friday 18 October. On Thursday 17 October (untimed) the Spanish news agency EFE reported from the country’s Interior Ministry that 97 arrests had been made and that 194 officers of the Catalan Police (Mossos) and Spanish Policía Nacional had been injured.

The Guardian pretends to be a serious newspaper for grown-up so it had to cover Borrell's comments. Nevertheless, its presentation clearly tells its readers how to interpret them.



Readers may wonder why this blog does not analyse the BBC’s appalling coverage of Catalonia. There is a simple answer – life is too short.

Sources (English)
The Economist
The Guardian
(Spanish)
EFE
(97 arrests and 194 police injured during the riots in Catalonia)





Tuesday, 15 October 2019

Non-violence Catalan style


Catalan independence supporters like to tell the world that they follow the path of non-violence espoused by Gandhi and martin Luther King. As always they lie, but a gullible world chooses to believe wheat the toadying international media tell them.
Yesterday a middle-aged woman was parading in Tarragona with a Spanish flag. Her flag was seized and she was assaulted. The thug who punched her had every reason to suppose that he would get off scot-free. He knew that the Mossos (Catalan police) would do nothing even after his photo and name were published on social media. However, he reckoned without the Spanish Policía Nacional who have found him and taken him into custody.





The Policía Nacional have arrested the person who attacked a member of the public in Tarragona yesterday for carrying a Spanish flag.

He has been arrested for an offence against the exercise of Fundamental Rights and Public Freedoms and for minor assault.

There is a video of the incident (link below)

Source (Spanish)
Canarias7
(Aggression against a woman with a Spanish flag in Tarragona)

The Guardian supports far-right sedition in the EU


Yesterday Spain’s Supreme Court found the former leaders of Catalonia’s government guilty of sedition and issued a European arrest warrant on that charge against Carles Puigdemont, the former Catalan premier who proclaimed the unilateral independence of Catalonia in 2017.
Yesterday also, the Guardian published an article written by this man who is on the run from a very serious charge of offending against public order to achieve an illegal political end.
Catalan nationalism intends to subvert the constitutional order in the EU. Its contacts with hard right parties and movements in the UK, Belgium, Holland, Austria, Germany and Italy are well known. Puigdemont himself has been described by the Czech think tank European Values as useful idiot for Russia.
Puigdemont likes the Catalan Identitarian Movement, whose name leaves little doubt as to its nature.
The Guardian’s pet Corbynite Owen Jones, who couldn’t tell a xai from a xarnego if he tripped over either of them, nevertheless recognises his British entitlement to tell the Dagoes how to manage their affairs.
It goes without saying that the Guardian knows perfectly well what the true situation is; it pays its correspondents in Spain, Sam Jones and Stephen Burgen, to know exactly this sort of thing, and it even did a mea culpa in October 2017 for having been conned into publishing fake news about Catalonia. But even so, it gives a platform to a man whom it describes in the language of sedition as being “in self-imposed exile”. Really? How many Irish Republicans who ran to the Republic of Ireland or the USA, or common criminals on the so-called Costa del Crime, were “in self-imposed exile”? But they weren’t sowing sedition in an attempt to destroy democracy and the EU, were they?
Today’s Guardian has a leader that pronounces arrogantly, pompously and mendaciously:
The draconian jailings shame Spain. Both Madrid and Brussels, which has refused to intervene, should do everything to resolve the situation as soon as possible.
Mendacious, because the Guardian knows perfectly well that the EU cannot intervene in the internal afairs of a member state. But the anti-EU line of Catalan sedition goes down so well with its readers.
Fortunately, Huffpost is on the case with a touch of sane reality.
In short, the purpose of the support of the European extreme or radical right for Catalan secessionism is to support a movement that, if it is successful, will serve as an example for its own local separatist claims, to defend its conception of a Europe of ethnic microstates. Also to strike a deadly spear thrust into the European Union which would be unviable to govern if it were made up of hundreds of countries and, should it disappear, we would return to the period that led to the two world wars. That is why the main pro-European voices have spoken out against Catalan secessionism: from Juncker to Valls, along with Merkel, Tajani and others. Even the not very pro-European Theresa May, in her case more for the danger in Northern Ireland and Scotland that she has at home.
Sources
(English)
Guardian
Wikipedia
(Spanish)
Economía Digital

Puigdemont da un “me gusta” al acoso de ultranacionalistas catalanes

(Puigdemont gives a “Like” to harassment by Catalan ultranationalists)

Huffpost

(Why the European extreme right supports Catalan separatism)

Crónica Global

(Puigdemont is named a “useful idiot” for Russia by the European Values observatory)



Scottish nationalist SNP backs sedition in Catalonia

In Scotland, First Minister Nicola Sturgeon commented on the Catalan verdict from the SNP’s ongoing autumn conference in Aberdeen, saying: “I am appalled by today’s outcome.
“These politicians have been jailed for seeking to allow the people of Catalonia to peacefully choose their own future. Any political system that leads to such a dreadful outcome needs urgent change.
“The future of Catalonia should be decided through the ballot box – not in the courts.”
Sturgeon continued: “While it is not for us to take a view on the future of Catalonia, we do have a view on the upholding of democratic expression and civil rights – and have a duty to speak up whenever and wherever those rights are under attack.
“Our thoughts and solidarity are with those sentenced today and their families.
“We will continue to encourage the Spanish and Catalan Governments to resolve their differences by mutually agreed democratic means.”
Yesterday in the British parliament Ian Blackford, parliamentary leader of the SNP, made a stirring speech in support of the criminals who were jailed in Spain yesterday for plotting and executing seditious acts to subvert the public order of Spain, a respected, democratic country in excellent standing with the EU, NATO and the Council of Europe.

His comments about Catalonia are at the start of this video.



While making his speech Blackford and the SNP MP sitting next to him can be clearly seen wearing the yellow ribbon of Catalan sedition. The SNP claims that in the event of achieving Scottish independence it will apply for Scotland to join the European Union. But that raises the worrying question of why the EU should be willing to accept a member state whose leaders have openly expressed undeniable support for a seditious attempt to wreck it.










Saturday, 5 October 2019

1930s fascism in Catalonia

The common narrative of the 1930s is that the Spanish Second Republic came into existence without sin in 1931 via a form of constitutional virgin birth, governed a paradise on earth for five years, and was destroyed by a fascist coup because destroying peace and happiness is what fascists do, especially when they can have a go at peaceful, democratic Catalans.


Needless to say, it was a lot more complicated than that. In fact, the 30s saw a rise of fascism in Catalonia. The nationalists of Estat Català made contact with Mussolini for advice. This is the organisation that ultimately developed into the separatist party ERC that now governs Catalonia.
Catalan Escamots in Barcelona
Catalan nationalists rebelled twice against the Republic, once in 1931 almost immediately after it began, and again in 1934 when they piggybacked on the socialist revolution in Asturias. On that occasion, the Guardia Civil disarmed the Mossos (Catalan police) and arrested them. Many Catalans would like to see that happen again. By tomorrow lunchtime please.

The political literature and imagery was unambiguous.

Racism was rife.
Spaniards out of Catalonia. We Ourselves! [This name is the meaning of the Irish Sinn Féin and was adopted for that reason.]
We Ourselves!
Catalonia First. We Ourselves!
Against Spain and the Spaniards. We Ourselves!
For a Catalan army. We Ourselves!

Xarnegos is the insulting name given by Catalan nationalists to people from other parts of Spain.
Stop immigration. Catalonia for the Catalans. Youth wing of Estat Català. [Note that the Catalonia shown in this map includes part of France, Andorra, the Spanish Mediterranean coast of Valencia and the Balearic Islands.]
How you brutes arrived in Catalonia. And how you’ll go back if you don’t integrate. Xarnegos out!
Preserve our ethnic identity. Youth wing of Estat Català.
The German student. Fight for Führer and People. To the team of the National Students Union.
Join the young patriots. Youth wing of Estat Català

The association with Nazi Germany was clear.
We Ourselves! Young people. For a fighting ethic.
Free Catalonia. United Europe. PNSC [Catalan National Socialist Party]
Anti-Marxist patriots, PNSC [Catalan National Socialist Party]
PNSC [Catalan National Socialist Party]
Sources
Very many works in English deal with this period of history, covering the historical facts that are readily available but are widely ignored by those who find that they clash with their preferred narrative.
The history of the Republic is described in:
Stanley G. Payne, The Collapse of the Spanish Republic, 1933-1936: Origins of the Civil War
These histories of the Civil War have been well received:
Hugh Thomas, The Spanish Civil War
Paul Preston, The Spanish Civil War
Antony Beevor, The Battle for Spain: The Spanish Civil War 1936-1939
(The author of these lines has not read Beevor’s work.)
George Orwell’s Homage to Catalonia is a journalistic description of his personal experience. It is a work of great importance and interest for the insights that it contains, but it does not in itself constitute a full or reliable account of the Republic or of the Civil War.
This blog: