Showing posts with label Franco. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Franco. Show all posts

Saturday, 26 October 2019

Digging up Franco in the Economist


The Economist is to be congratulated again on its balanced coverage of Spain. Its article on the exhumation of Franco concludes thus:
The Socialists want to turn the Valley into “a museum of memory”. There is a risk in that of history once again being written by one side. Perhaps the best thing would be to deconsecrate the site and create a museum that explains what happened at the Valley itself. … Modern Spain is not in thrall to Franco’s ghost. Most Spaniards have no memory of the dictator. Only an ageing minority still regularly attend mass. But the lack of unanimity over the exhumation shows that the country has yet to agree on the past. Perhaps it never will.
The crucial, and most unusual, point that is made here is the clear recognition that Spain is still far from achieving closure and a simple view of the events of the 1930s, from the creation of the Second Republic in 1931 to Franco’s victory in 1939. The Left often gives the impression that it seeks revenge, that it wants to refight the war and win it this time, rather than desiring unity. It will indeed take time to agree on the past, much more than is pretended by those who seek an immediate rewriting of the “historical memory”. The start of a search for consensus and common agreement would be welcome.

Monday, 8 July 2019

Guardian propaganda

Every day the Guardian has an article “From the archive”, one that was published on that date in a previous year. It’s a good idea to look back on previous events. What did it celebrate on 4 July? The anniversary of Spanish prime minister Adolfo Suárez agreeing that the Generalitat (Catalan government) should be restored as part of the system of regional government that would be implemented in all of Spain.

Why did it choose that article to remember? And why this photo of a flag that was hardly known then? Who can say? Was it at the behest of Diplocat, the external propaganda wing of the Catalan government? Very probably. The Guardian has shown great willingness in the past to weigh in on the side of the Catalan coup d’état against an EU member state, having on one memorable occasion described the Generalitat offices as the presidential palace of the new Catalan Republic.
The article commemorates what was certainly an important date; even so, Suárez’ recognition of the Generalitat on 28 September of that year was surely a greater event, as certainly was the return of Josep Tarradellas on 23 October of that year. Why did Diplocat choose to have it published on Thursday? Because it has other things up its sleeve for the autumn with the verdict of the trial, and anyway the coincidence of the date with American independence is a fine subliminal message.


Incidentally, the article repeats the old canard that Franco “tried to obliterate the Catalan and Basque languages”. As these images show, the dictator was welcomed to the Catalan city of Lérida with a sign in Catalan (1963), and a plaque from an irrigation community honours his name in that language (1964).














The Guardian is of course free to choose which archive articles it publishes, though this choice does bear the murky footprints of placement by Diplocat. On wonders too why they chose to commemorate this rather than other 4 July events:
1914: The funeral of Archduke Franz Ferdinand and his wife Sophie.
1934: The death of Marie Curie.
1943: The Battle of Kursk.
1946: The Philippines attains independence.
1947: The Indian Independence Bill is presented to the House of Commons.
1976: Israeli commandos raid Entebbe airport in Uganda.
1987: Former Gestapo chief Klaus Barbie is convicted of crimes against humanity.
2012: The discovery of particles consistent with the Higgs boson.
What is certain, however, is the Guardian’s own editorial decision to illustrate the article with the rebel flag, the estelada. The Guardian knows perfectly well that the estelada is not the Catalan flag and captioning it as a photo of a demo against the suspension of Catalan autonomy in 2017 simply won’t wash when the article carries an illustration of Tarradellas’ return in 1977 showing the constitutional flag, which is what happened at the time. As I have described, that suspension of autonomy has been ratified by the European Court of Human Rights in pungent terms (describing the appeal as “manifestly ill-founded”). The Guardian knows that perfectly well too.
Yes, the Guardian knows these things perfectly well and has nevertheless acted as an agent of the propaganda department of the rebel Catalan government. A powerful news source of the size, scale and global reach of the Guardian is deemed a priori to know perfectly well what it is doing. It does not get the benefit of the doubt.
Sources (in Spanish)
El País
(The day that Suárez recognised the Generalitat)
El País
(Suárez-Tarradellas: first step to the re-establishment of the Generalitat)